Explicit boundaries of what this epistemic system will not assert
The most credible systems know their limits. Here's what we explicitly do not claim.
This system does not claim to identify objectively "true" or "false" content. We estimate credibility based on available evidence, not absolute truth.
We do not claim our credibility estimates are perfectly accurate. All estimates include uncertainty, and we may be wrong in individual cases.
We do not claim to know everything about a video's value. Our estimates are based on observable signals, which are necessarily incomplete.
We do not claim to predict how a video's value will be perceived in the future. Credibility estimates are based on current evidence and may change.
We do not claim to know what individual users will find valuable. We estimate general credibility patterns, not personal preferences.
By explicitly stating what we don't claim, we: